Avoiding Worst Practices In Channel Management
Tuesday, January 6th, 2009Too often channel strategies ranging from the most tactical and short-term to the most strategic and multi-year fail. Success or failure of a channel management strategy has nothing to do with the time horizon; it does however have everything to do with perspective, timing, and getting away from a “one and done” mentality in so many companies today. A channel management strategy is never done – it is an iterative process that too many sales, operations, service and marketing managers ignore instead of own – the “fix it” mentality is so pervasive that there are a few channel management software vendors surviving because they are doing the work of sales, marketing and operations.
When channel strategies implode it’s too easy for companies to say that the business model changed and the channel strategies didn’t keep up, or their channel partners rejected strategies because competitors were offering more margin, dollars, or attention. Those are all cop-outs and speak to symptoms rather than causes.
Worst practices in channel management gets started when these factors begin surfacing, and get perpetuated by a perspective of companies thinking they can buy their way out of these problems. In fact spending just forestalls the pain:
- “One and done” mentality about lead management, order capture and service. I’ve seen high tech manufacturers in industries known from cut-throat pricing let their managers, directors and even VPs sit behind their desks all day right after putting a channel management system in place. Sure, the sales force was worked with to begin with to get their feedback – but now that the system is in and launched – these organizations tend to breathe a collective sigh of relief and settle back in their comfort zones which often includes ignoring rather than serving Sales. So organizational life goes on before – except there is now a $1M plus system in place for serving the channel and the sales force – and the people who were so passionate about it are now on to another project, or worse, their work lives before the system went in. Nothing changed really; there is a “done” mentality pervading these manufacturers, and while usage rates hover less than 30% or less no one has the time or economic incentive (read bonuses) to make things changes for the better.
- “The Sales Number You Called Has Been Disconnected…” Ironically the manufacturers who do have initial success with channel strategies take their best managers, directors and VPs turn them into firefighters first, long-term business process owners second. A top director at one manufacturer spearheaded a successful pricing program for indirect channels that included streamlining special pricing requests. The system had major integration challenges with SAP and Oracle ERP instances, and this high achieving Director worked diligently with channel management, system integration and IT managers to solve the problem – and the result was a system that ran flawless. The trouble was that this Marketing Director was so strong at organizing the system; time spent staying in touch with Sales suffered. The result: the most effective Director in the company lost touch with Sales’ needs.
- Lack of integration expertise. With the pipeline for channel management deals slowing down at the beginning of this year there is a tendency of most struggling channel management vendors overstating their ability to handle integration. Don’t just check the references vendors you’re qualifying give you; go find the references they don’t want you to know about – their failures will teach you much more than their successes. One manufacturer recently did this and found that error messages – while promised to be in customers’ specific format – weren’t in over a year. That bumped the vendor down three levels in the short list.
- Beware of vendors waiting for the M & A Train. I’ll go out on a limb here and predict that there are going to be easily over forty different mergers and acquisitions throughout all of enterprise software, and at least three that will re-align CRM overall and channel management specifically.
- Channel Strategies Must Rock The W2s Of Users. When it’s all said and done, one VP of Sales just nailed it with the comment “So what will these channel strategies do to my W2?” The combination of streamlining manual processes and automating them to make more sales happen must reverberate and rock the W2s of the sales people that depend on them. You may argue that channel strategies are just giving sales, operations and service the tools to do what they are already paid to do – but anyone involved with sales, marketing and channels is dollar driven – and W2s are how these people keep score. Want to win with your channel strategies? Then rock the W2s of the channel members you serve. That is critical.
Bottom Line: This year there is going to be more manufacturers becoming channel driven than ever before. In previous years the U.S. Department of Commerce has said that 70% of all revenue in distribution will come from indirect channels. That has held constant in the last three years, and more manufacturers have failed than succeeded trying to tap into that potential revenue stream. Consider why companies have failed and plan accordingly, but be sure to always ask “How does this grow the W2s of the people who will use this system every day?” and then you can sell with confidence to the most deal-savvy of Sales VPs out there.


